About three
years ago, Jeremy, my brother, got into a relationship with a Caucasian
Australian, Louise. Six months into the relationship, they became set on marriage
– and a natural step was to get to know the in-laws.
Jeremy was quickly received and approved of by Louise's parents. However,
Louise’s introduction and, subsequent relationship, with my mother were
anything but smooth.
The face to face
interaction between the two started very cordially. However, over time, we noticed a tenseness between the two – the smiles seemed forced, especially when in
contrast with their cold eyes. Furthermore, they would individually reflect on how they felt
unsure of each other to either Jeremy or to us (his siblings).
These little
of ‘information’ usually left me feeling very annoyed and drained – why couldn’t
they simply talk things out?! I felt like I was in the midst of a spite-war.
A fight never
broke out between the two. However, my brother did snap under the pressure of mediating, as well as conveying messages, between the two. This happened when my mother delivered an ultimatum to
him: “Break up with Louise, or else she will destroy this family!”
He got so
upset that he began shouting hysterically and actually smashed a chair on the ground in full view of my
parents. When I found
out, I was frankly more angered at my mother’s words and attitude, than at my brother’s!
My mother was brought up to place
ultimate value on the family. Everything that threatened the family’s
solidarity had to go. Furthermore, she also believed that the would-be daughter-in-law had to ‘prove
herself’ before being accepted. Lastly, it was only
right that the daughter-in-law should bring up issues to the husband's mother, and not the other way around.
Louise, on the other hand, came from
a more liberal background. She addressed her parents by their names, and was
not raised in a home with a lot of familial obligations and expectations. Her
parents were as willing, and prone, to initiate apologies and discussions over issues.
My brother too had his own culture –
a mix of the two. He valued family, and thus desired my parents’ blessing. However,
he also carried a measure of individualism; he would not dismiss his
relationship with Louise so simply. I feel my sister and I would probably fall into this category as well.
Thus, it is actually not too hard to
see how this got this complicated. My family environment was one with more
interactional rules as compared to Louise’s. Furthermore, these rules were hardly explicit. Thus Louise understandably
needed time, and an understanding environment, to adapt.
Both women also had incompatible
expectations and assumptions of each other. Louise wanted to ‘just be herself’,
while my mother was expecting her to fit a certain mold. Louise and my mother
both expected each other to initiate reconciliation, as both felt that for them to do it themselves would be just 'wrong'.
Lastly, in playing mediator, my brother
further encouraged them to conceive each other from their cultured
perspectives. Eventually, both cultures threatened to tear him apart. Perhaps my sister and I could have also been more assertive in enlightening both on the fact that they were tremendously misunderstanding each other.
These were some conclusions that my family (including Louise) drew through discussion.
What could have been other reasons for this tension between the two?
What could have been other reasons for this tension between the two?
![]() |
| Louise has reconciled with my mother, and the marriage happened. This awesome fellow joined the party a year later! (Also, Louise and Jeremy are fake names) |
